Diplomacy for dummies.

Today, another would be friend of President Obama; Mahmoud Ahmadinejad poked fun at the disastrous dolt for his new nuclear arms treaty with Russia. The POTUS is also limiting when America would use nuclear weapons in retaliation to attacks, promising no nuclear weapons will be used if they are not used on us. I don’t know, it seems pretty ridiculous to me to have to wait for a nuke to go off before you use one. I guess all that need be said here is god bless the soul of Harry Truman!

Ahmadinejad basically said to Obama what all of us on/in the right have said from the beginning, that he’s inexperienced. In a speech today the Iranian President said,

“American materialist politicians, whenever they are beaten by logic, immediately resort to their weapons like cowboys.”

Whoa, slow down, Obama? A cowboy? I’ll disagree with Adolf Jr. on this one. Obama is no cowboy, in fact he’s the direct opposite of that, he’s more like the guy the hero cowboy runs out of town, saving the townspeople from continually getting screwed by the cunning fork tongue snake in the grass.

Ahmadinejad went on to mock Obama saying, “Mr. Obama, you are a newcomer. Wait until your sweat dries and get some experience.” CLASSIC! Now, don’t get me wrong, the last thing I want to do is agree with lunatic hell bent on destruction. But…. You have to admit, the guy hit the nail right on the head! He is a newcomer, and not just to the world stage, but the national stage. He came in with zero experience, and hasn’t learned from any one of his many failures so far.

So Obama is cutting and limiting our nuclear defense in a diplomatic move that is sure to increase threats in the future. Promising only conventional warfare in retaliation to attacks, Obama is inviting disaster. I’m going to as a serious question, and yes, it’s rhetorical. Why does Barack Obama want American soldiers to die? One of the loudest mouths in Washington opposing the war in Iraq, he does not see the trouble with conventional warfare against an unconventional enemy? This is where I disagreed with George W. Bush in Afghanistan. I think we should have gone in, kicked ass, and got out.
Even better, I was a huge supporter of using tactical nukes. I know there are many, many people on both sides that do and will disagree with me. But one tactical nuke in Afghanistan, and we would have had Osama, and Al-Qaeda would’ve been outcast by supporting regimes in fear of a tactical nuke fired upon their own countries.

But here we have him folks, the left’s “Diplomatic leader.” The one who would use diplomacy to raise the worlds opinion of us once again.

Diplomacy for dummies folks, while we fear more attacks he is disarming our greatest advantage over any enemy that wishes to harm us.

But the really funny thing is, that no one country likes us more now than they did when Bush was in office, But you can bet your bottom dollar (If you still have one) they certainly don’t fear us as much as they did when the original “Cowboy” was in office.

Filed under: Featured

Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!